Friday, 29 January 2021

Lupine Publishers | Race, Reality and the Road to Redemption: COVID-19‘s Precipitous Pandemic Problem among Black Lives that Matter

 Lupine Publishers | Scholarly Journal Of Psychology And Behavioral Sciences




Abstract

Race and ethnicity and socioeconomics are high and heinous risky punitive pawns in game of life and health care relative to underlying conditions that impact health. Long-standing systemic health and social inequities open the door and maintain a breeze of devastating consequences putting many people from racial and ethnic minority groups at increased risk of getting sick and dying from COVID-19. The term “racial and ethnic minority groups” includes people of color with a wide variety of backgrounds and experiences. Equally important, But some experiences are common to many people within these groups (heart disease, dementia, alzheimers, diabetes, stroke, etc.). Yet, specific social determining factors wreak havoc on individuals, particularly of color: Social determinants are simply are conditions in the places where people live, learn, work, and play that affect a wide range of health and quality-of life-risks and outcomes.

Introduction

The bottom line is that social determinants of health have historically prevented them from having fair opportunities for economic, physical, and emotional health. Furthermore, there is unequivocal evidence that some racial and ethnic minority groups are being disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Factors that contribute to increased risk include but not limited to : Ignorance and Irresponsiblity: Individuals across the racial divide in America often believe they are invincible and immune to the virus, etc. They consciously choose not to wear mask nor keep their respective distances 6 feet or further. Hygiene is not taken seriously nor health efforts to minimize the spread and contagiousness of COVID 19. Far too many persons take solace in having house parties, cookouts, barbecues, backyard fellowships and birthday partiesall of course with either limited masking, distance or essentially none at all. Discrimination: Unfortunately, discrimination exists in systems meant to protect well-being or health. Discriminating systems include health care, housing, education, criminal justice, and finance. Make no mistake about it, discrimination in any form which includes racism, can lead to chronic and toxic stress and shapes social and economic factors that put some people from racial and ethnic minority groups at increased risk for COVIDHealthcare access and utilization: People of color and lower income backgrounds are more likely to be uninsured than non- Hispanic whites. An injury and insult is the reality of many other factors, such as lack of transportation, child care, or ability to take time off of work; communication and language barriers; cultural differences between patients and providers; and historical and current discrimination in healthcare systems. Many people of color don’t trust the healthcare system and they shouldn’t. Why? Because life is a cruel teacher: It gives you exam first, then the lesson (Table 1). The historical realities of exploitation, abuse, degradation and death specifically targeted at people of color are a matte of public and private records such as the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the African American Male and sterilization without people’s permission highlight this reality.
Occupation: People of color are grossly represented in work settings such as healthcare facilities, farms, factories, grocery stores, house keeping, cleaning, and public transportation. Some people who work in these settings have more chances to be exposed to the virus that causes COVID-19 due to several factors, such as close contact with the public or other workers, not being able to work from home, and not having paid sick days. Educational, income, and wealth gaps: Inequities in access to high-quality education for some racial and ethnic minority groups can lead to lower high school completion rates and barriers to college entrance. This may limit future job options and lead to lower paying or less stable jobs [1]. People with limited job options likely have less flexibility to leave jobs that may put them at a higher risk of exposure to the virus that causes COVID-19. People in these situations often cannot afford to miss work, even if they’re sick, because they do not have enough money saved up for essential items like food and other important living needs.

Table 1: The statistics are grim.

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-journals-psychology-behavioral-science

Housing: Some people from racial and ethnic minority groups live in crowded conditions that make it more challenging to follow prevention strategies. In some cultures, it is common for family members of many generations to live in one household. In addition, growing and disproportionate unemployment rates for some racial and ethnic minority groups during the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to greater risk of eviction and homelessness or sharing of housing. These factors and others are all associated with more COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in areas where racial and ethnic minority groups live, learn, work, play, and worship. They have also contributed to higher rates of specific medical illnesses and conditions that increase one’s risk of severe illness from COVID-19. In addition, community strategies to slow the spread of COVID-19 may cause unintentional harm, such as lost wages, reduced access to services, and increased stress, for some racial and ethnic minority groups [2-4].
s Furthermore, neuro-cognitive implications are meticulously decisive in their impact and impetus effects: Whether it is mental fatigue and mild loss of concentration major neuro health issues are frequently reported by people with COVID-19. More severe cognitive impairment is reported in those with secondary illness such as stroke, which has been reported even in younger COVID patients and is believed to result from coagulopathy caused by SARS-CoV-2. Encephalopathy is observed after extubating, possibly due to lingering effects of sedation and possibly due to the effects of mechanical ventilation. This often resolves over a period of days but can sometimes persist for weeks or even months.

Conclusion

Encephalopathy can be further exacerbated by bacterial infection, which can develop during ventilation. So far there are relatively few reports of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-CoV-2, although it is possible more reports of direct infection will emerge over time, similar to previous coronavirus outbreaks (e.g., the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2003 and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak in 2012) And the most recent medical and scientific reports showed that the most severe cases of COVID-19 were the most likely to develop neurological symptoms [4-8]. Risk factors for neurocognitive symptoms in those cases are similar to other populations with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Those risk factors include pre-existing diagnoses such as dementia, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and epilepsy. Increased risk of neurocognitive effects is also associated with pathophysiological events during acute care, such as hypoxemia, hypoperfusion and inflammatory response. Finally, further increase in risk is observed when management during acute care includes sedation, mechanical ventilation, and complications such as delirium. Consequently, we have been warned. Wear your mask. Wash your hands. Wedge the distance (whether its 6 feet or 6 steps)…because this virus…this vicious and vile venom of bio-chemical expression is coming soon to a place….a person and/or a predicament near you

 

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/pdf/SJPBS.MS.ID.000191.pdf

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/fulltext/race-reality-and-the-road-to-redemption-covid-19s-precipitous-pandemic-problem-among.ID.000191.php


For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/


For more Psychology And Behavioral Sciences Please Click 

Here: https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/

To Know more Open Access Publishers Click on Lupine Publishers

Follow on Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/lupinepublishers

Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online



Friday, 22 January 2021

Lupine Publishers | Dirichlet Distribution as a Model for Evaluation of the Condition of Adaptive Regulatory Systems in Human Organism in Heart Rate Variability Analysis

 Lupine Publishers | Scholarly Journal Of Psychology And Behavioral Sciences


Introduction

Search for methods of quick human organism condition estimation, early disease and pathology detection including pre-clinical and premorbid stages is still a challenge for the health care service, in particular, in relation to medical and demographic processes including population ageing which is apparent in most developed countries [1]. In preventive medicine in addition to information about disease occurrence and non-occurrence, it is important to be able to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the health condition of people from various age, social, occupational groups plus organism’s functional reserves [2]. Nowadays a few methods are known which are based on heart rate variability analysis and indicate the state of regulatory systems of various levels [3,4]. However, each of the said methods has particular limitations which urge researchers to continue searches in the field. The problem articulated at the dawn of the method advent, namely investigation and evaluation human organism’s adaptation processes [5] which might be consistent with aims of physiological studies remains urgent.
The problem is also important in many application aspects, in particular, for prompt control of patients’ state in treatment and rehabilitation processes, and timely diagnostics of disease danger and prevention of related complications. In other words, the information to be acquired may be used for treatment and rehabilitation control, and primary, secondary, and tertiary disease prevention. The purpose of this paper is to examine the capability of the evaluation method for state of adaptive regulatory systems in heart rate variability analysis which is based on the statistical Dirichlet distribution model.

Materials and Study Methods

To evaluate physiological capability of the method we examined a few groups of patients having cerebrovascular pathology and generally healthy people of various ages. We studied: 68 patients (36 female and 32 male) aged 32 to 65 having circulatory system diseases and diagnosed with encephalopathy; 38 patients (20 female and 18 male) aged 32 to 65 having circulatory system diseases and diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident; 38 generally healthy patients (21 female and 17 male) aged 32 to 60 having no cerebrovascular pathology symptoms. The reference group included 23 generally healthy patients under investigation (14 female and 9 male) aged 18 to 23. All people under test were investigated using standard method: electrocardiograms (ECG) were produced for 5 minutes with people at rest in prone position. The electrocardiograms were obtained using Poly-Spectrum-8 electrocardiograph (Neurosoft LLC, City of Ivanovo). The cardiointervalograms were constructed using Poly-Spectrum-Rhythm software and analyzed in a PC using RR Viewer. When developing the method we assumed that regulation system of blood circulation comprises a multi-circuit hierarchically self-organizing system exhibiting non-linearity, sophistication and open nature while dissipative processes including friction, diffusion and dissipation construct ties between components and elements of the said system and generally progressive motion thereof. The complex nature of interaction between elements of the nervous, hormonal, and humoral regulation system and effect on of the state thereof of many external poorly-controlled factors result in that the processes which define heart rate variability exhibit accidental nature and may be represented by a statistical model (statistically) in the form of probability distributions. We proposed to use Dirichlet distribution as the said model. As a model the distribution is informatively equivalent to the object of which state displays the outcome of joint occurrence of n-1 independent processes xi occurring at rates (intensities) of vi and opposite in essence to the process occurring at the rate of vn [6,7]. The function of the Dirichlet distribution which is defined on a k-dimensional simplex is equal to (1).


The model agrees with the formal connective between equilibrium thermodynamics and non-equilibrium thermodynamics and is consistent with main provisions of the dissipative structures theory proposed by I. Prigogine, the Nobel Prize winner [8]. Dirichlet distribution entropy can be represented as a sum (2).


corresponds to the entropic flux accountable for the interaction processes with environment. At n ≥ 3 entropy (4) may be both positive and negative which in Dirichlet distribution model terms makes it possible to regard He(an) < 0 as one of the selforganization conditions.
The state of homeostasis in control of the autonomic nervous system of cardiac function was assessed [9] by the self-organization indicator value (factor) in control of the autonomic nervous system of cardiac function (Self-organization of Autonomic Nervous System Control - SANSC) expressed by equation (5):


where DiQ − is the number of Dirichlet models of i-dimensionality with a negative outer entropy value found in temporal series of RR intervals within the investigation period, and DiQ + is the number of Dirichlet models of i-dimensionality with a positive outer entropy value found in temporal series of RR intervals within the investigation period. Contribution made by individual elements of the autonomic nervous system to the self-organization of vegetative regulation was assessed by the quantity of Dirichlet models found in the temporal series of RR intervals within the investigation period: of 2-4 (parasympathetic nervous system) or 5-7 (sympathetic nervous system) dimensionality with negative outer entropy. Self-organization factor of cardiac function control by the parasympathetic nervous system (Self-organization of Parasympathetic Nervous System Control - SPNSC) as opposed to [9] is calculated from the formula (6).


Self-organization factor of cardiac function control by the sympathetic nervous system (Self-organization of Sympathetic Nervous System Control - SSNSC) is calculated from the formula (7).


Contribution to cardiac function control self-organization of humoral processes was assessed by the factor value of humoral cardiac function control self-organization (Self-organization of Humoral Control - SHC) (8).

Summary

The investigation we carried out has shown that informational and statistical heart rate variability analysis data sufficiently indicate the state of homeostasis of cardiac function control systems both for normal condition and pathology. This fact may be essential in studies of organism functions regulation processes, makes it possible to get the idea about organism’s homeostatic opportunities and numerically evaluate them. The method we propose may be used for treatment and rehabilitation monitoring as well as primary, secondary and tertiary disease prevention.

 

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/fulltext/dirichlet-distribution-as-a-model-for-evaluation-of-the-condition-of-adaptive-regulatory-systems.ID.000190.php

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/pdf/SJPBS.MS.ID.000190.pdf


For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/


For more Psychology And Behavioral Sciences Please Click 

Here: https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/

To Know more Open Access Publishers Click on Lupine Publishers

Follow on Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/lupinepublishers

Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online



Monday, 18 January 2021

Friday, 15 January 2021

Lupine Publishers | Give, and You Shall Receive: Mental Health Professionals and Stigma Towards Persons with Mental Illness

 Lupine Publishers | Scholarly Journal Of Psychology And Behavioral Sciences


Abstract

Stigma is one of the barriers that hinder people with mental illness from successfully engaging in treatment, which contributes to mental illness having a substantial global burden of disease. This review article examines the duality of the relationship between mental health professionals and stigma towards mental illness. Mental health professionals are subject to associative stigma by virtue of the people with mental illness whom they work with, which can bring about significant distress to the mental health professionals. Despite the need for a non-judgemental attitude for optimal engagement, Health care professionals are not immune from stigmatizing beliefs of their own. On top and above of anti-stigma initiatives with the general population in mind, healthcare workers have been prioritized as a target group for anti-stigma efforts. This is because they have the Potential to impact others, including both persons with mental illness and the general public, through the course of their daily work. Before their professional roles, the training stage might provide the ideal platform to introduce anti-stigma efforts. This benefits of this might not be immediately evident, but this has a long-lasting impact with the potential to turn the wheels of change at the societal level.

Keywords: Social stigma; Mental illness; Medical staff; Physician patient relations; Nursing staff; Nurse patient relations

Introduction

Persons with mental illness grapple with stigma and the discrimination that comes along with their mental health condition. At the public health level, this represents a major concern as it contributes to the treatment gap which discourages those in need of professional help from seeking assistance. Looking across the consultation table, mental health professionals themselves are also subject to associative stigma from peers who might be working in domains outside of mental health. This divide comes across as ironic, given the advocacy for an integrative approach towards mind and body. Mental health professionals work to help those with mental illness, but are individuals themselves shaped by influences and personal experience from their immediate surroundings and societal environment at large. They would also form their own opinions about people with mental illness, with some of these opinions dating back to even before undergoing training in their field.
When surveyed in comparison to the general public, mental health professionals in Australia [1] and America [2] were found to have more positive attitudes about people with mental health problems. This was also the case for Croatian medical doctors [3]. However, these results were contrary to the author’s experience when surveying ward-based doctors and nurses in an acute hospital about patients with alcohol use disorder [4], which revealed stigma amongst healthcare workers to be worse than the general public. This article consolidates literature over the recent two years pertaining to stigma towards mental illness and healthcare professionals. It considers healthcare professionals from both perspectives, as the recipients of such stigma and the personnel concurrently exhibiting discriminatory attitudes.

Mental Health Professionals Being Stigmatized

Mental health professionals experience associative stigma, where they are negatively stereotyped because of the people with mental illness whom they work to help. This has an impact on them, similar to what their clients and patients would experience. While there might be a cultural component in associative stigma such that a greater degree of respect tends to be accorded to mental health professionals in China than the US [5], examining the manner in which Chinese psychiatrists address the topic of stigma with psychiatric patients and their relatives [6] might shed light on how this comes to be the case. As a consequence of stigma, doctors with mental health concerns might experience reluctance in opening up. Whether at the stage of a trainee [7] or beyond, disclosing mental illness might cause an individual to be perceived as “weak” and undermine their professional competence. They are hence less likely to disclose this in the work setting, to co-workers and employers alike, and to seek professional assistance for themselves. There is room for much more to be done to support professionals with mental illness. Ensuring the presence of medical care with sufficient confidentiality, occupational health support and back-towork interviews [8] are but some of the measures with potential to make a difference.

Healthcare Professionals as Stigmatizers

It is paradoxical to note that healthcare professionals concurrently exhibit stigmatizing attitudes. The “Inter Nos” (Latin for “Among Us”) study surveyed attitudes of healthcare professionals towards mental illness, across multiple centres in Spain, Portugal and Italy [9]. Hospital-based staff were found to have more stigmatizing responses on both the Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-27) and The Community Attitudes towards the Mentally Ill (CAMI), agreeing more readily with restrictive options, coercion and segregation. In particular, the more discriminatory attitudes and responses tended to come from nursing assistants as well as staff in non-clinical and “other clinical” roles. When mental health professionals stigmatize the persons with mental illness whom they work with, this has the potential to undermine diagnosis, treatment and successful health outcomes [10]. Right from the start, this might adversely affect the therapeutic alliance. This in turn hinders the mental health professionals’ understanding of the service user’s problem, leading service users to disengage from treatment more readily [11] which ultimately sets up a vicious cycle as a self-fulfilling prophecy. This only serves to reinforce the pre-existing negative stereotypes held by the mental health professional.

Education as a Possible Means of Addressing the Problem

Before health care professionals assume their vocational roles, they are, first and foremost, individuals in society just like every member of the public. Interventions targeted at the general public would have an impact on them, but yet more can be done during the course of their professional training. Experiences at the early stages of training can certainly go a long way in terms of professional development, and others have advocated for antistigma initiatives to begin at the educational stage. Data from United States demonstrated the presence of an educational gap [12], such that psychiatry coursework for pharmacy, nursing and social work students did not improve stigma towards mental illness. This might seem disheartening, but the identification of such educational gaps is the first step in allowing them to be addressed by means of appropriately incorporating anti-stigma training. Following exposure to the mental health curriculum, improved attitudes towards people with mental illness were found in medical students from UK [13] and South Africa [14], as well as nursing students from Turkey [15-17] There might truly be a role for the revision of curriculum pertaining to mental health, for anti-stigma programmes to be included as part of the courses. This might turn out to have a more profound educational impact than factual content found in textbooks and learnt by rote, about what constitutes mental illness and how these are treated.

Future Research

From direct contact intervention to Responding to Experienced and Anticipated Discrimination (READ), there have been no shortage of ideas on how to tackle stigma through education. However, the single most effective modality of delivering the anti-stigma message remains to be seen. Though focused on low- and middle-income countries, a recent systematic review had difficulty in pinpointing the most effective anti-stigma intervention [18]. Future head-tohead comparisons of these varying modalities would help to point the best way forward. Healthcare workers in particular have many opportunities to come into contact with persons with mental illness. For the person with mental illness, each interaction can either work out as a disappointment or a positive encounter. Their influence cannot be understated, and the impact of stigma in this group warrants anti-stigma interventions to prioritize this group. It is worthwhile to note the protocol for a randomized controlled trial in Chile [19] targeting primary healthcare workers, and to see how this would unfold.

Conclusion

Corrigan & Nieweglowski suggested a parabolic relationship between familiarity of mental illness and public stigma [20], where people tend to stigmatize those with mental illness when they were either unfamiliar or too familiar with them. This proposal does suggest that too much of exposure might not be a good thing after all, and there exists an optimal balance in terms of the experience to deliver during training. The need to address stigma towards mental illness has never been questioned, though the best methods to do so remain elusive. While the sentiment of the public is important, this author is a believer of the saying “charity begins at home”. Mental health professionals and healthcare workers working outside of mental health domains are two groups that need to be targeted. This is for the wellbeing of their service users, as well as themselves.

 

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/pdf/SJPBS.MS.ID.000189.pdf

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/fulltext/give-and-you-shall-receive-mental-health-professionals-and-stigma-towards-persons-with-mental-illness.ID.000189.php

For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/

For more Psychology And Behavioral Sciences Please Click 

Here: https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/

To Know more Open Access Publishers Click on Lupine Publishers

Follow on Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/lupinepublishers
Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online

Friday, 8 January 2021

Lupine Publishers | Counseling Case Report: Smoking Cigarette

 Lupine Publishers | Scholarly Journal Of Psychology And Behavioral Sciences


Abstract

This paper is a counseling case report of 15 sessions on a client who has been diagnosed with smoking cigarette from Kelem Worq Preparatory School. CO6 was an 18 -year-old grade 12th social stream student in Keleme Worq Preparatory School. CO6 was the second of the four children in his family. Assessment tools included a detailed interview and behavioral records. CO6 has been smoking cigarette since grade eight. At the time of counseling CO6 smoked five per day. CO6 drunk 4-6 glasses of beer occasionally, has done this for several years. Other than these drugs no other drug use reported. Many factors identified during the assessment were considered critical in accounting for the cause and persistence of CO6’s cigarette smoking [1,2]. Cognitive behavioral counseling was the theoretical framework that informed the case formulation. The counselor used self-reports of the client as outcome measures. SQ3R study method, the five Ds and cognitive behavioral therapy technique were applied to solve the client’s major problems of academic, smoking and alcohol drinking problems, respectively. Progress was evident by improved class attendance, more sustained focus on her academic studies, and continued improvement in sleep. The client has minimized his cigarette smoking and stopped his alcohol drinking.

Introduction

This paper is a counseling case report on a client who has been diagnosed with smoking cigarette from Kelem Worq Preparatory School. The assessment part has included the necessary identifying information with appropriate changes to shield the client’s real identity [3]. As part of the treatment plan the presenting problems will be identified and matched to the criteria set forth in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition text revision (DSM-IV-TR) multi-axial diagnosis( its new version is also available, DSM-V).

Nicotine or Tobacco Use Disorders

Tobacco Use Disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), diagnosis assigned to individuals who are dependent on the drug nicotine due to use of tobacco products. Tobacco contains the psychoactive drug nicotine, which is a central nervous system stimulant. The immediate effects of nicotine administration are tachycardia, hypertension, increased respiration, hyperglycemia, enhanced memory storage, improved concentration, and appetite suppression. Nicotine can be taken through several routes, including inhalation (smoking cigarettes, cigars, or pipes), chewing tobacco and snuff [4-8]. Nicotine produces dependence and withdrawal symptoms upon cessation of use, the onset of which occurs about one hour after the last dose. Withdrawal symptoms include irritability, annoyance, anxiety, and cravings for nicotine. Substance abuse disorders have high comorbidity with tobacco use disorder. People in early recovery from other drugs or alcohol tend to smoke heavily or chew tobacco.
Features of tobacco products that enhance their addictive potential include the rewarding properties of nicotine, the behavioral reinforcement of the hand- to -to mouth habit, lack of social support to cease smoking, the ease of access of tobacco products, and the cultural acceptance of tobacco products. Another factor which enhances nicotine’s addictive qualities is bioengineering by tobacco companies, which add ammonia to nicotine to facilitate absorption and bioavailability (Figure 1). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders indicates that risk factors for Tobacco Use Disorder include low-income levels, low level of Education, and diagnosis of the following disorders: conduct disorder, depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, personality disorders, psychotic disorders, and other substance use disorders. There is also a genetic component to Tobacco Use Disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).


Case Description

CO6, code name of the client, was an 18-year-old grade 12th social stream student in Keleme Worq Preparatory School. He was the second child among the four children. His father was 55 years old and lives outside Addis Ababa due to his workplace, but he visits his family in every weekend day. C06 had smooth communication with his father. His mother was housewife and learned up to grade 12. C06’s mother was a smart for him, and she communicates friendly. His oldest sister in the family was 22 years old, and she was indulgent, reluctant to take great care of others. The rest younger sister and brother are 14 and 8 years old, respectively, and both of them have good communications with him. C06 described his parents’ parenting style as democratic. C06’s birth and childhood time were normal. He grew up in a close and loving family and recalls a happy childhood, and uneventful adolescence. As he reported that his parents were supportive and sensitive to his needs and encouraged his to be independent and responsible.
CO6 describes himself as a “good boy” who excelled socially and involved in many extracurricular activities. But he described himself as not good boy in academic performance as he was socially. He had a healthy self-esteem growing up and never engaged in risky behaviors or got into trouble other than smoking cigarette and drinking alcohol. CO6’s peer relationships during childhood and adolescence were good and he remains close with several high school friends and he was remembered by his jocks. CO6 had also developed good peer relationships with neighborhood children and enjoyed with them sometimes. CO6 dated during elementary school and had a few casual relationships while he was high school students. Still he has not serious romantic relationship with anyone. CO6 struggled to get out of bed in the morning, sometimes missing his morning classes. He stays up until 8:00 or 10:00 pm for eating and watching TV but he did not have much involvement during super time. And he had good self-esteem towards himself and had not suicidal ideation and never attempted suicide. Until this professional contact CO6 had not seen by any other professionals for a serious physical or mental problem.

Clinical Assessment

I would like to inform you that I have had 15 sessions in person with this client. The clinical assessment included a clinical interview and behavioral observation. CO6 has been smoking cigarette since grade eight. At the time of counseling the client smoked five per day. He started smoking again after awaking the first cigarette smoked was within the first 30 minutes. CO6 drunk 4-6 glasses of beer occasionally, has done this for several years. He didn’t see alcohol drinking as a problem. CO6 always smokes while drinking alcohol and CO6 used coffee sometimes. Other than these drugs no other drug use reported. When CO6 became depressed he wants to smoke. In addition to his depression, head ace, watching his friends while they smoked or handed cigarette, drinking alcohols and sometimes his low performance in academic were the most triggering factors for his desire to smoke.
CO6 had no past successes with behavior change: Quit smoking twice when he was grade nine for 2 months but relapsed. He, at the time of counseling, wanted to quit smoking to prevent the medical and social consequences of smoking. Even if CO6 was ready to quit at this time, CO6 was worried about his ability to succeed in his quitting. His limited time for self-care, peer pressures, his low selfconfidences to quitting, absences of social supports from his schools and families and his alcohol consumptions were his potential barriers to quitting. However, his strong motivation, strong health reasons, one previous quit attempt with some duration (2 months), his high self–esteem towards himself and, friends who want to quit with him were the assets of the client.

Diagnostic Formulation

Based on the assessment findings in the initial interviews, the following diagnosis was formulated.
Axis I: Substance abuse (cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking).
Axis II: No
Axis III: No
Axis IV: Problems related to the social environment (inadequate social support), and Educational Problems (academic problems and inadequate school environment)
Axis V: Moderate functioning

Case Conceptualization

Several factors identified during the assessment were considered critical in accounting for the etiology and persistence of CO6’s cigarette smoking. Cognitive behavioral model was the theoretical framework that informed the case formulation. The emphasis placed on developing a case formulation leads to treatment goal-setting and planning. CO6 was an eighteen-year-old boy who came from a medium class family. His chief complaint when he met the counselor was that he smoked cigarette accompanied by symptoms such as withdrawal and tolerance symptoms. CO6 said that he can’t concentrate in attending classes every day, which was why CO6 said he left school to smoke cigarette after break time. As the clinical interview revealed that the client had not exposed his smoking for his parents. CO6’s most serious problem was his cigarette smoking. From a behavioral perspective, these impulse control difficulties may have developed because of faulty learning experiences, including pressures from his close friends in school and neighboring, his modeling of his significant others’ behavior and lack of guidance from parents. For CO6’s problem behaviors, precipitating factors included alcohol drinking, holding of cigarette by his friends and watching of theses friends while smoking , going to toilet with friends at break time and his thought of ‘’I am poor in education”. Client’s perpetuating factors included his poor quit attempts, no support at school, withdrawal symptoms associated with cigarette smoking and his low self-confidence in succeeding in quitting cigarette smoking.
CO6’S strengths include his sociable behaviors with school and neighboring friends. CO6 has a strong desire to quit smoking as CO6 believed that health and social consequences of cigarette smoking was inevitable. The counselor selected cognitive behavioral therapy for this client to solve his problems of cigarette smoking and its associated symptoms. It has been shown that cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined with a smoking cessation medication (such as the nicotine patch, nicotine gum, for example), is quite effective for smokers who are motivated to quit. Cognitive-behavioral counseling is an evidenced-based psychological treatment that focuses on identifying and changing maladaptive thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that trigger, worsen, and/or maintain a range of problems (such as depression, anxiety, addiction, etc.). Because changing your smoking-related behaviors-and restructuring your thoughts related to smoking urges- is essential to quitting, cognitivebehavioral counseling can effectively be applied to smoking cessation. An intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy program is typically composed of three phases: preparation, quitting, and maintenance (or relapse prevention).

Treatment Plan and Course of Treatment

Based on the case formulation, CO6 and the counselor collaborated in the development of the following prioritized list of problems and treatment goals. The order and relative importance placed on these goals was largely determined by the client, although there was input from the counselor in directing treatment efforts to goals that would have the most impact on CO6’s cigarette smoking and its associated symptoms, and had the greatest likelihood of success. The treatment plan followed the problem format, a format that presents the target problems with its major goal and objectives and intervention methods in structured form.

Problem-1: low academic performance
a) As evidenced by: low results grade to grade.
b) As evidenced by: poor class attendance.
c) As evidenced by: lack of study skills.
d) As evidenced by: absent from schools.
e) As evidenced by: late in the morning to go to school.

Goal-1: to improve academic performance
Objectives and Interventions.

Objective-1: teaching study skills

Interventions: The SQ3R study method was employed to target co6’s poor study skills and to improve his academic performance.

Objective -2: Increase class attendances

Interventions: To improve class attendance, a behavioral contingency was developed to ensure CO6’s woke up by 7:00 am so he could attend all his scheduled classes for that day. In addition, CO6 would shower, eat a light breakfast, and walk to school. If he completed this schedule 3/5 days, CO6 would reward himself by going pool houses for the weekend or to the movies with classmate.

Objective -3: work on sleep difficulty

Intervention: Poor class attendance and an inability to study were major contributors to poor academic performance. It was decided to target CO6’s sleep difficulties that were a major cause of missing classes and daily fatigue that made it difficult to study. Maladaptive sleep-related behaviors were identified, and corrective homework assigned. The client and the counselor set up a sleep log and agreed to keep the sleep log, maintain regular sleep hours, eliminate daytime naps, to make sure the bedroom has oxygen, and restrict bedroom activities to sleep.

Problem 2: Cigarette Smoking
a) As evidenced by: smoked for five years.
b) As evidenced by: nicotine dependence withdrawal.
c) As evidenced by: fugue out of school for smoking.
d) As evidenced by: slum physical appearances.

Goal-2: Cigarette Smoking Cessation
Objectives and Interventions.

Objective 1: To confront with the urge to smoke

Intervention

To achieve this objective the client and counselor applied the five Ds

a) Delay, even for a short while.
b) Drink water.
c) Deep breathing.
d) Do something different and,
e) Discuss the craving with another person.

Objective 2: Teaching different behavioral tips to quit smoking cigarette

Intervention tips

a) Write out a list of reasons to quit and display it prominently e.g. on wall.
b) Get rid of all tobacco products, ashtrays, lighters, matches, etc. from all areas which you inhabit.
c) Clean all clothes in order to remove cigarette smell.
d) Enlist the support of non-smoking friends, relatives, and workmates.
e) Change the environmental cues, e.g. the telephone often causes a reflex action to smoke, move the telephone to another place to change the cue.
f) Keep hands busy e.g. knitting, gardening, drawing, origami.
g) Sit in non-smoking areas.
h) Positive self-talk.
i) Try to avoid stressful situations in the immediate period after stopping.
j) Set aside the money normally spent on cigarettes to buy something as a reward do not drink alcoholic beverages because these are associated with relapse.
k) Avoid, even temporarily, social situations normally associated with smoking. practice saying, “No thank you, I don’t smoke.
l) Ask other smokers not to give cigarettes, offer to buy cigarettes or smoke in the patient’s presence.
m) Think positive and remember your reasons for quitting in the first place.
n) View quitting as a day-at-a-time process rather than an immediate lifelong commitment.

Problem 3: alcohol drinking

Goal 3: To stop drinking alcohol: The psychologist also offered cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for his alcohol abuse and some behavioral tips.

Progresses

The counselor used self-reports as outcome measures. The therapist reviewed co6’s sleep log and daily activity record to evaluate the success of these interventions at modifying sleep behavior and class attendance. Progress was evident by improved class attendance and a more consistent bedtime routine. CO6 reported better class attendance; more sustained focus on her academic studies, and continued improvement in sleep. The client has minimized his cigarette smoking and stopped his alcohol drinking. The treatment is still under supervision.

Strengths and Weakness

Use of the core conditions of (empathy, genuine and unconditional positive regard) as relationship building throughout the whole counseling processes helped me to express my values, reactions, and feelings as they became appropriate to what was happening in the therapy sessions. It helped me to create a trusting working relationship with my client. The process helped the counselor to understand the value of supervision. The supervision helped the counselor to identify themes that had not been obvious to the counselor. It helped the counselor articulate the counselor role as a counselor. Supervision helped the counselor to identify areas where the counselor was not challenging my client enough and to be conscious of any manipulative signs by client and how to handle them. Supervision also helped the counselor to identify strengths in empathizing, listening, summarizing, and paraphrasing. Sometimes client would tend to talk very little and at such times the counselor would tend talk more and to give advice to my client may consider as weakness.

 https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/pdf/SJPBS.MS.ID.000188.pdf

https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/fulltext/counseling-case-report-smoking-cigarette.ID.000188.php


For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishersgroup.com/


For more Psychology And Behavioral Sciences Please Click 

Here: https://lupinepublishers.com/psychology-behavioral-science-journal/

To Know more Open Access Publishers Click on Lupine Publishers

Follow on Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/lupinepublishers
Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online

Locus of Control and Vulnerability to Peer Pressure: a Study of Adolescent Behavior in Urban Ghanaian Context

  Abstract Peer pressure is one thing that every individual is vulnerable to and has faced before at some point in their lives. It is beco...